Artefacts in Archaeology III: Round
up the usual suspects?
Session Organisers: Paul Blinkhorn and Chris Cumberpatch
(Sheffield)
Following successful sessions based
around the theme of artefacts in archaeology at the Durham and Bradford
TAG conferences, the authors propose a third session, somewhat wider in
scope than the previous two. While artefacts in the conventional sense
of the term will be covered (albeit from angles intended to represent the
innovative and novel), a number of the papers are designed to demonstrate
that a concern with the material nature of the encounter with the past
does not end with the recovery, interpretation and presentation of archaeological
material in its restricted sense. Once we move beyond the realms of the
imagination and of oral narration, our contact with the past is, above
all, a material one, experienced through the medium of the world of objects
(to be considered inclusively from the single artefact to the widest landscape).
That such encounters are necessarily situated and contextually specific
is now widely acknowledged and it is hoped that this session will demonstrate
that this fact offers the opportunity for further investigations of human
relationships with the physical world.
Duncan Brown
(Southampton)
My Mum's House and other stories
This paper compares the evidence for
pottery use in a 20th century English context with that for medieval society.
I shall be looking at the range of rooms within which pottery is used within
three dwellings. These are the houses of my mother, who lives alone in
a rural bungalow, Victoria and Simon who live with their two year old son
in a Winchester town house; Frank and Tobie who live in the country with
their three children. The pots in each room are classified by vessel type
and function and have been counted. The data for each dwelling is compared
and this will lead to a consideration of the implications for interpretations
of archaeological evidence. Similar data from medieval excavations and
historical sources will be presented as a contrast and the conclusions
will dwell on the archaeological lessons we can learn from our own experiences.
Chris Cumberpatch
(Archaeological Consultant, Sheffield)
Some observations on the concept of 'embedded'
and 'disembedded' economies in archaeological discourse.
As part of a continuing attempt to
situate the domain of 'the economy' as a significant arena of social action
and discourse, the author will present some observations on the use of
the terms 'embedded' and 'disembedded' to describe the characteristics
of institutions associated with the production, circulation and consumption
of material culture. The extent to which economic activity can ever be
said to be disembedded will be questioned with reference to recent work
in economic sociology and the implications of this for archaeology will
be discussed.
Jonathan Bateman
(Sheffield University)
Film and Fetish: Imaging the materials of excavation
Archaeological excavation is a performance
rooted in its social and material occupation of space. The histories created
by those who work at and visit excavation sites are mediated through their
interactions both with others on the site and with the material presence
of the 'dig' as constructed by archaeologists. This is the story of a photographic
exploration of the ways in which the social relations of the site can be
manifested both in personal physical space and how they might be reflected
in or derived from the material culture of archaeological practice. The
use of photographic images in archaeology is bound up with their perceived
role as objective records of a physical reality. This paper offers new
ways in which images can be used to illustrate the interaction that excavators
have with their material surroundings as well as laying photographs alongside
the tools and products of excavation as the fetishised accoutrements of
archaeological practice.
Alex Norman
(Sheffield University)
The Art of Fine Archaeology
The nature of our contact with the
past is a material one. That is to say, the evidence of past life is a
material residue which we come into contact with as the artefact. However,
what is it that actually defines the nature of an artefact? If we understand
the artefact as being our link with the past, it follows that this will
include anything that we in the present share with the past. In its broadest
sense, the landscape can be considered in these terms. Just as we inhabit
and create our environment, so too did people of the past inhabit, use
and understand their environment ... a landscape that we can see today.
How was this past landscape understood? We can not begin to think about
this question without first attempting to understand our own experience
and situation within the landscape. Part of the art project carried out
at Gardom's Edge in Derbyshire (concurrently with a programme of archaeological
excavation and survey) is an attempt to visualise this understanding, and
so to encourage people to think in terms of their own situation in the
landscape and thus the archaeology that surrounds them. To make a contemporary
understanding of our place in the landscape explicit necessarily leads
to an encounter with past understandings.
Gabor Thomas
(Institute of Archaeology, UCL, London)
Late Saxon Strap-Ends and Dress Accessories:
A Window into Social and Regional Identities in Mid-Late Saxon England
Late Anglo-Saxon strap-ends (in this
case, spanning both the mid and late Anglo-Saxon periods, c. AD650-1050)
are valuable for both art-historical and artefact studies of the period.
Thanks to recent archaeological and
metal-detecting activity, the number of these objects has increased in
excess of ten-fold in the last 35 years, and this paper will present some
newly-identified regional groupings. It will be argued that there is evidence
for the existence of workshops that manufacturing strap-ends which were
tailored to local tastes and fashions, and the products of these will be
compared with types which had a much more widespread popularity and circulation,
unrestricted by political and geographical boundaries, not only reflective
of economic factors such as craft-specialisation, but also of social factors
such as increasing national identity.
Jon
Humble
(English Heritage)
Cleansing the Doors of Perception -
This paper will consist of a consideration
and critique of some of the methodologies presently utilized in the analysis
of prehistoric flint assemblages, and suggest some alternative ways to
approach the material.
David Howlett
(The Bodlean Library, Oxford).
The Dark Ages. Not. -
This paper will comprise a survey
of literary and epigraphic evidence of the use of classical Latin as a
medium of intellectual discourse. An examination of the work of three major
fifth-century Romano-British writers, Pellagius, Patrick and Fautus of
Riez will be followed by a survey of British stone inscriptions in high-register
Latin of the 5th-9th centuries. These sources will be used as a basis to
argue that too many archaeologists have equated high-status artefacts with
intellectual thought, and vice-versa.
Angela Boyle
and Alastair Barclay
(Oxford Archaeological Unit)
Bronze Age water holes and Iron Age rubbish
- yet another example of votive deposition in later prehistory
Paul Blinkhorn
(Oxford Archaeological Unit)
'All art is quite useless'
Artefacts analysts dealing with the
late Medieval period have traditionally used manuscript illustrations as
a primary source for placing material culture in its social context. Increasingly,
the more formal paintings of the fifteenth and sixteenth century Flemish
and German schools are being used in the same manner. This paper will examine
the use of such sources and, using paintings such as Van Eyck's 'The Arnolfini
Wedding', consider how reliable they are.
G Thomas
(Institute of Archaeology,
London)
Dress accessories and social and regional identities
in late Saxon England
C Jones
(Sheffield University)
Stone tools and evolution