Body matters
Session Organiser: Mary Baxter
(Cambridge University)
We are all by our very nature as people
embodies, and experience and interact with the world through our bodies.
BODY MATTERS aims to look at the representation of body and soul in archaeology.
Papers range from prehistoric burial practices and their interpretation
to bodies in art and archaeology in both prehistory and the present. Such
a span of topics within an underlying theme should provide a stimulating
experience.
Mary Baxter
(Department of Archaeology, Cambridge
University, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ)
Dismembering secondary burial
Mortuary practice in Neolithic Britain
has long been a subject of debate: were bodies excarnated and selected
bones interred in a tomb, whole bodies interred and later re-arranged or
bones removed after a time, to be moved across the countryside? Much of
the theory behind these ideas stems from texts written in the early part
of this century. Recent research indicates that it may be time to think
again.
C Malone, S Stoddart, & M Tommony
(Antiquity Office, New Hall, Cambridge,
CB3 ODF.and Dept of Archaeology, Cambridge University, Downing Street,
Cambridge, CB2 3DZ)
Articulating disarticulation: a Maltese experience
The Maltese islands are well known
for their prehistoric temples. Less well known are their funerary remains
since, until recently, the prime mortuary site, Hal Saflieni, was an empty
architectural framework without any knowledge of the bodies it once contained.
Recent excavations at the Brochtorff Circle at Xaghra have provided insight
into these bodies by uncovering a comparable site. Here, various combinations
of skeletal remains, animal bones and figurative art provide intriguing
evidence of the prehistoric concept of the body in these central Mediterranean
islands. Early results of the computerisation of these largedeposits will
be presented in a broader framework of the cultural organisation of the
Maltese islands in the fourth and third millennia BC.
M Pearce, D Garton & A Howard
(Dept of Archaeology, University of
Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD; Trent and Peak Archaeological
Trust, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD; Wolfson College, Barton Road,
CB3 9BB)
Dumping the dead in the late Neolithic
The paper will discuss the
results of recent excavation at Langford Lowfields (near Newark, Notts),
a gravel beach along an abandoned channel of the River Trent, where an
accumulation of brushwood had entrapped a selection of skulls: 13 human,
3 sheep, 1 aurochs, 4 domestic cattle, 1 deer and 2 dogs; plus a small
selection of post-cranial material and 5 large antlers.
It will be argued that the
site is best interpreted as evidence for mortuary practice involving excarnation
and a ritual emphasis on skulls, both human and animal. The site may offer
a clue to the treatment of those dead who were not interred in round barrows.
J Robb
(Dept of Archaeology, University of
Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ)
Fragments of the prehistory of violence in
Italy
Violence is many things: a way of
constructing social relations, a cultural icon, a constraint on economy
and settlement, a physical hazard. In this paper I bring together four
disparate sources on violence in prehistoric Italy: (1) architecture, (2)
artifacts and their contextual use, (3) iconography, and (4) skeletal evidence.
Interestingly, these often do not agree. For instance, the Neolithic, which
lacks weapon iconography and artifacts, has high rates of skeletal trauma
and defensive architecture; in the Copper Age the situation is the reverse.
As this suggests, we cannot assume that symbolisms of violence imply that
violence was also practised. In the Italian case, there are varied sociological
reasons why the rise of violence symbolisms coincided with the fall in
violence rates.
T Saetersdal
(Institute of Archaeology, University
of Bergen, H.Sheteligsplass 10, 5007 Bergen, Norway)
The body as cultural symbol
This paper will be concerned with
the socio-cultural context of body art, such as scarification and mutilations.
It builds on ethnoarchaeological research carried out in Tanzania and Mozambique
among the Maconde population. The aim is to discuss the role of body art
in social and cultural reproduction and the implications for archaeological
interpretations both on a general and particular level. This type of material
culture has a very wide distribution in time and space and is used to express
cultural specific ideas and beliefs. Even though there is no connection
in the specific meaning content of these symbols, the very act of subjectifying
the body, making it both an object and a subject, is a near universal tradition.
This case study looks at how decoration is applied to children's bodies
as they are transformed into adult members of society through elaborate
initiation rituals. This transformation is manifested in a decorated body.
The body is a multivocal symbol bearing messages both to living humans
and spirits of long gone ancestors. The bearer of the symbolically embellished
skin is protected and cured while fertility and good fortune is enhanced.
The changing symbolic meaning content will be seen in relation to a social
context of rapid cultural change and re-production.
L Janik
(Newnham College, Cambridge CB3 9DF)
Visual perception of the body in Palaeolithic
and Mesolithic figural art
This talk explores the way the human
body was presented by the prehistoric artist. I explore the variation in
and similarities between figurines and the way the image was constructed,
as well as the visual dimensions of particular figurines. I look at the
shape, dynamism and movement of the figurines. I relate the prehistoric
images to the figural art in the antique period, Classicism and modern
art to relate the possible similarities and differences in visual perception
in prehistory, historical
period and contemporary age.
The Palaeolithic and Mesolithic figurines
from Russia, Lithuania and Latvia are going to be discussed in this paper.
A Kaniari
(Wolfson College, Barton Road, CB3
9BB)
The physical self exposed: exhibiting the body
as/in art and archaeology
This paper will explore the transformation
of the human body from concept of a physical entity containing the self
into object- exhibit in two contexts- categories: Art and Archaeology.
Attitudes, objectives and products
will be analysed comparatively using theory and examples coming from specific
exhibitions: Peter Greenaway's "The Physical Self", the work of specific
artists and "archaeological" approaches to the human body as reflected
in archaeological museums' exhibitions.
Visual representations of the prehistoric,
"primitive" human, ethics of exhibiting human relics, the use of manequines
and the authority-granting photographs of the archaeologists and anthropologists
exhibited next to their representations-reconstructions of past humans
will be juxtaposed with the body in the arts: the body as art object and
the body as process (performance art).
Issues of ownership, authority, subjectivity/individuality,
identity and the place of the self, as well as the physical quality of
the body during the process and as a product of the exhibiting attitudes
of the two categories-art and archaeology, will be discussed and evaluated
in the light of the question: Which is the relationship, if any, of these
bodies-products with the living and thinking individuals of the 20th century.
S J Reevell & A M Dorse
(UNCAL. c/o Dept of Archaeology, Cambridge
University, Downing Street, CB2 3DZ)
As dead as a dildo: drawing on the non origin
of heterosexuality
Key words: dildo, heterosexuality,
phallogocentric, politics, textuality, violence.
Developing from existing models for
the Origin of human sexual behaviour, this paper logically erects a deconstructed
psychoanalytical critique of the Self and human sexuality. In drawing through
a combined weaving of personal experience and ongoing archaeographical
and ethnographical field research, we attempt to demonstrate the instability
of the teleological, metaphysical and phallogocentric tradition of heterosexuality
and its derivatives (e.g. bi-sexuality, homosexuality) upon which
[behavioural] evolution is necessarily grounded.
Offering a radicalisation of dis-engengendered
sexuality, our research posits an always already political violence at
the core/corpse/cause of all heterosexual activity: of
which, archaeology is inseparably a part. This brief exposition attacks
the all too often social ambivalence that inhabits and inhibits the above.
Out-lining a libidinal textuality of pragmatic desire, we hope for a solicitation
of the denial used to protect archaeology's onoristic and missionary like
position.