Zamoste, Moscow Region, Russia: A wet landscape
It is known that the monuments of the Stone Age had glad distinct fastening to the definite peculiarities of relief. Therefore the main objective aerial survey of Zabolotskoe paleolake and surrounding wet lands in Serviev-Posad district of Moscow region was the reconstruction of paleorelief. The idea was to mark the areas that are the most perspective for surface archaeological surveys. It was suggested to carry out computer processing of aerial photographs and to check the obtained results by traditional methods of surface archaeological surveys.
The result of the computer processing of imageries was the definition of some paleorelief objects (ancient islands and rivers), which ancient settlements may be connected with. But a field checking showed, that these objects concerning belated ancestry and they have no direct traces of the monuments of the Stone Age. The more ancient objects of relief are superseded by powerful belated deposits and meanwhile are not recognised on aerial photographs. Nevertheless we believe, that combination of the methods of the computer processing of imageries with surface archaeological surveys and with drilling will give the opportunity to distinguish features connected directly with the most ancient (post glacial) relief of investigated area.
Geomorphological aspects of landscapes with reference to Neolithic sites in the central part of Russia
During the Neolithic period (V-III millennium BC) the sites were situated on the high places in flood-land and on first linchet upper the flood-land. It happened because of the specificity of hunters and fishermen economy. On the south one can see the confusion of the forest and forest-steepe areas population. The archaeological sites of Desna Neolithic culture located in the Desna-river basin. To the west there were the sites of the Upper Dnepr Neolithic culture. These are located in the basin of Sodg-river which is the large Dnepr tributary. These two cultures were separated from each other by Desna-Sodg watershed. It is the sites which display very close cultural similarity that were located at the territory linked by Desna and Sodg old river valleys. The country between two rivers of Desna and Oka was the natural border that separated Desninskaya culture from the archaeological sites of L'alovskaya culture located in the country between Volga and Oka rivers. Population of Desninskii look occupied the territory where the Desninskaya lowland bound up the Volg-Oka basin
The Domesticated Nature: Animals and Landscapes in East-European Eneolithic
One of the narratives depicts animals in split representation or drawn alone in horizontal frames. Each of these images have small triangles positioned on the inferior register of the image, which could be taken for images of mountain ridges.
Another narrative depicts several animals following each other. I believe to have identified here a hunting scene with horses and dogs chasing a stag or a roe-buck. In this image the mountain landscape is very comprehensible, under the shape of twin mountains painted as small triangles positioned at the foot of the animals. The image of the horse and a dog chasing the game is an argument in favour of the existence in the Cucuteni culture of a hunting (ritual) on horseback with pack as described by Herodotus. The hunting, "over mountains and valleys" is a foundation myth frequent in folk cultures.
This narrative presents two instances of domestication: that of animals (the image of the domesticated horse is one of the earliest in Eastern Europe) and that of the (geometrized) landscape.
One can see in the Cucuteni example one of the oldest interpretations of landscape in prehistory. The landscape, like the domesticated animals, is controlled by rhythm, symmetry and perspective (dimension). If, because of its structure, the hunting image is asymmetrical, the landscape rhythms and confers to it a mythical-geographic dimension.
Round barrows in their landscape: A new interpretation of Bronze Age funerary ritual as two separate traditions, Conspicuous and Inconspicuous Barrows)
The Inconspicuous barrows were designed to honour the dead without altering the world of the living. They would not have established a new ritual landscape, and their grave goods are few, traditional and domestic. This may reflect a system of land-ownership based on a tradition of respect for the world of the ancestors. The same people may have been farming the nearby land and burying their dead in the local Inconspicuous barrows.
The Conspicuous barrows show a desire to change the landscape with new monuments. Both the grave goods and the barrows were expensive and spectacular: the Conspicuous barrow tradition represents an individualistic ideology in which access to exotic objects was important.
Earliest urbanism: structure and functions of a city in some primary civilizations (Mesopotamia and Mesoamerica)
These cities were unlike to the modern ones. Economically they were based on agriculture, crafts' specialization and trade (external in a major part). However the main thing in the understanding of an essence of an ancient city is a hierarchy of communal structures; extended patriarchal family, village community (inside of a city - "ward", "district", "block") and a group of united village communities transformed in a process of the merging in the qualitatively new whole - a city.
During the époque of early antiquity city is usually as a centre of a small state (city - state). There were located a residence of a ruler (king) of this state and a temple of the supreme deity.
All earliest cities of Mesopotamia and Mesoamerica were primarily polyfunctional; they had politic-administrative, ideological, economic, military-defensive (refuge) functions.
Flour power: A Marxist-systems approach to the contextual preservation of industrial buildings
Domestic architecture and sedentism among prehistoric and historic inhabitants of Eastern Chukota
The re-building of the choir of Canterbury Cathedral
The concepts of signification, domination and legitimation derived from Giddens (1984) offer a way of analysing the relationship, and can themselves be related to early mediaeval theory and concerns.
Although the monument visually dominates its urban setting and rural surroundings, the role of landscape in the rebuilding was economic and thus concerned with domination through the ownership and allocation of resources. As a resource it provided stone, timber, metals and minerals, most of which were not local. These and other construction costs were paid for by funds derived from the ownership of land by the monastery and other donors. Landscape appears to have had little or no value as signification.
The monument was built because the previous choir had burnt down. Four years after the fire, Archbishop Thomas a Becket was murdered in the cathedral, so the new building would also have to house the tomb of a potential Saint. Thus the monument has many levels of signification. It is arranged both for existing religious purposes and for the new role of pilgrimage to a shrine. Religious signifiers are built in: the windows, for example, provide several iconographic schemes. The shrine, though, has more than a spiritual meaning. It is solid and visible reminder of a range of social issues, many concerned with legitimation.
In an age which saw a fist-fight between the Archbishops of Canterbury and York it is not surprising that the social issues concern conflicts of legitimation not only between institutions - Church/State, Papacy/Monarchy, King/Archbishop - but within them. Giddens' underlying concept of duality of structure is well displayed in the insecurities of the holders of apparently secure offices. The same duality can be demonstrated within another social system, that of the building trade, whose role is described in details which are checkable against the monument.
The paper will conclude with the notion that sound explanatory concepts can be of value over extensive historical periods. Giddens' model helps to explain, rather than simply describe, the rebuilding of Canterbury choir.
Conserving Artefacts in the Wild: Issues in Building Conservation